- (60)
- Abuse of Office (19)
- Bribery (12)
- Conflict of Interest (3)
- Conspiracy to commit an offence of corruption and economic crime (4)
- Emblezzlement (2)
- Engaging in a project withoutprior planning (1)
- False accounting (7)
- Fraud (11)
- Fraudulent Acquisition of public funds (1)
- Soliciting for a Benefit (39)
- Stealing (4)
- Wilful failure to comply with the law relating to the management of funds and incurring of expenditures (3)
- About rada
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 21 OF 2018 - Godwin Musungu Kitui Vs Republic
Summary: Appellant contested the trial court's conviction on grounds that the charge was not proved, that the main culprit was not arrested and that there were disprecancies in the evidence. The court in reviewing the totality of the evidence concluded that the charges of soliciting and receiving a bribe were sufficiently proved and upheld the trial court's decision. Appeal dismissed.
Case Information
First offence date: 30/Mar/2016
Start date: 10/Jul/2018
Ruling date: 01/Jan/1970
Defendant plea:
Amount involved: KES 20,000.00
Type of case: Soliciting for a Benefit
Resolution comments:
Charge
Plea
Fine
Judgement
Count 1 - Corruptly soliciting for a benefit contrary to Section 39(3)(a) as read with Section 48(1) of the Anti Corruption and Economic Crimes Act.
Not guilty
0.00
Appeal dismissed
Count 2 - Corruptly receiving a benefit contrary to Section 39(3)(a) as read with Section 48(1) of the Anti Corruption and Economic Crimes Act
Not guilty
0.00
Appeal dismissed